JusticeDepartmentAnnouncesFindingsofInvestigationintoBaltimorePoliceDepartment_OPA_DepartmentofJustice.pdf – Grade A Homework

An o�icial website of the United States governmentHere’s how you know

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Wednesday, August 10, 2016


Department of Justice

Office of Public Affairs

Justice Department Announces Findings of Investigation into Baltimore PoliceDepartment

Justice Department Finds a Pattern of Civil Rights Violations by the Baltimore Police Department

The Justice Department announced today that it found reasonable cause to believe that the Baltimore City PoliceDepartment (BPD) engages in a pattern or practice of conduct that violates the First and Fourth Amendments of theConstitution as well as federal anti-discrimination laws.  BPD makes stops, searches and arrests without the requiredjustification; uses enforcement strategies that unlawfully subject African Americans to disproportionate rates of stops,searches and arrests; uses excessive force; and retaliates against individuals for their constitutionally-protectedexpression.  The pattern or practice results from systemic deficiencies that have persisted within BPD for many yearsand has exacerbated community distrust of the police, particularly in the African-American community.  The city and thedepartment have also entered into an agreement in principle to work together, with community input, to create a federalcourt-enforceable consent decree addressing the deficiencies found during the investigation. 

“Public trust is critical to effective policing and public safety,” said Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch.  “Our investigationfound that Baltimore is a city where the bonds of trust have been broken, and that the Baltimore Police Departmentengaged in a pattern or practice of unlawful and unconstitutional conduct, ranging from the use of excessive force tounjustified stops, seizures and arrests.  The results of our investigation raise serious concerns, and in the days ahead,the Department of Justice will continue working tirelessly to ensure that all Baltimoreans enjoy the safety, security anddignity they expect and deserve.  I am grateful to all of the community members, local officials, faith leaders and currentand former police officers who spoke with us during the course of our inquiry, and whose input will remain critical to ourefforts as we move forward.  Additionally, I commend the city and BPD for its proactive and collaborative approach toour inquiry and for demonstrating a strong commitment to restoring public confidence by already taking steps to makeneeded changes.  I look forward to continuing our work together to implement urgent and necessary reforms.”

“We found that BPD has engaged in a pattern or practice of serious violations of the U.S. Constitution and federal lawthat has disproportionately harmed Baltimore’s African-American community and eroded the public’s trust in the police,”said Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Vanita Gupta, head of the Civil Rights Division.  “The agency also failsto provide officers with the guidance, oversight and resources they need to police safely, constitutionally and effectively. In communities across America, even in communities where trust has been broken, we’ve seen transformative reformrebuild relationships and advance public safety.  In the weeks ahead, as we negotiate our consent decree with the city,we will seek input from law enforcement and community members.  With the city and commissioner’s commitment toreform, I am optimistic that we will work to drive that same progress in Baltimore.”

In May 2015, Attorney General Lynch announced the comprehensive investigation into the BPD after consideringrequests from city officials and hearing directly from community members about a potential pattern or practice ofconstitutional violations.  The investigation focused on BPD’s use of force, including deadly force; stops, searches andarrests; and discriminatory policing.

In the course of its pattern or practice investigation, the department interviewed and met with city leaders and policeofficials, including BPD Commissioner Kevin Davis, former commissioners and numerous officers throughout all ranksof the police department; accompanied line officers on dozens of ride-alongs in every police district; conductedhundreds of interviews and participated in meetings with community members, activists, and other stakeholders;reviewed hundreds of thousands of pages of police documents, including all relevant policies and training materials; andanalyzed BPD’s data on internal affairs, use of force, sexual assault cases and pedestrian stops, searches and arrests.

During the course of its investigation, the department found that the legacy of “zero tolerance” street enforcement, alongwith deficient policies, training and accountability systems, resulted in conduct that routinely violates the Constitutionand federal anti-discrimination law.  Throughout the investigation, the department heard consistently from both thecommunity and law enforcement that BPD requires significant reforms to address problems that undermine its efforts topolice constitutionally and effectively.   

The department found reasonable cause to believe that BPD engages in a pattern or practice of:

Conducting stops, searches and arrests without meeting the requirements of the Fourth Amendment;Focusing enforcement strategies on African Americans, leading to severe and unjustified racial disparities inviolation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act and the Safe Streets Act;Using unreasonable force in violation of the Fourth Amendment;Interacting with individuals with mental health disabilities in a manner that violates the Americans with DisabilitiesAct; andInterfering with the right to free expression in violation of the First Amendment.

The department also identified serious concerns about other BPD practices, including an inadequate response toreports of sexual assault, which may result, at least in part, from underlying gender bias.  Another significant concernidentified by the department was transport practices that place detainees at significant risk of harm.

In the agreement in principle, both parties agreed that compliance with the consent decree will be reviewed by anindependent monitor.  The agreement in principle highlights specific areas of reform to be included in the consentdecree, including:

Policies, training, data collection and analysis to allow for the assessment of officer activity and to ensure thatofficers’ actions conform to legal and constitutional requirements;Technology and infrastructure to ensure capability to effectively monitor officer activity;Officer support to ensure that officers are equipped to perform their jobs effectively and constitutionally; andCommunity policing strategies to guide all aspects of BPD’s operations and help rebuild the relationship betweenBPD and the various communities it serves. 

The agreement in principle provides a framework for change, but the department will be doing community outreach tosolicit input in developing comprehensive reforms.  Comments may be provided by email [email protected]    

Throughout the department’s investigation, BPD leadership remained receptive to preliminary feedback and technicalassistance, and started the process of implementing reforms.  BPD leadership has proactively taken steps to addresssome of the findings, including updating its policies, instituting new trainings and responding to other issues identified bythe department.  While these measures are an important start to cooperative reform, a comprehensive agreement is stillneeded to remedy all of the department’s findings.   

In October 2014, city and BPD leadership requested to enter a collaborative reform process with the JusticeDepartment’s Office of Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS office).  While the Civil Rights Division opened thepattern or practice investigation in May 2015, the COPS office, the Justice Department’s Office of Justice Programs andothers have maintained their ongoing efforts to offer federal resources, such as technical assistance, to the BPD, cityofficials and community leaders.

This investigation was conducted by the Civil Rights Division’s Special Litigation Section with the assistance of lawenforcement professionals pursuant to the pattern or practice provision of the Violent Crime Control and LawEnforcement Act of 1994.  Over the last seven years, the Special Litigation Section has opened 23 investigations into

law enforcement agencies.  The section is enforcing 17 agreements with law enforcement agencies, including 14consent decrees and one post-judgment order.  For more information on the Civil Rights Division and the SpecialLitigation Section, please visit www.justice.gov/crt. 

BPD Findings Report

BPD Agreement in Principle

BPD Executive Summary

SPL Police Accomplishments 8.10.16

Topic(s): Civil Rights

Component(s): Civil Rights Division

Press Release Number: 16-927

Updated August 10, 2016

Contact us to get a copy or Place an Order to get an original answer

☑ Very quick delivery
☑ Plagiarism free papers
☑ 24/7 support
☑ Cost friendly prices
☑ Money-back guarantee
☑ Unique and original content
☑ Total adherence to deadlines
☑ Negotiable prices and coupons